Suppose
for
are closed rectangles which form a cover
for
. By replacing the
with
, one can assume that
for all
. Let
.
Choose a partition
which refines all of the
partitions
where
Note that
is a rectangle of the cover
. Let
be any rectangle
in
with non-empty interior. Since the intersection of any two rectangles
of a partition is contained in their boundaries, if
contains an interior
point
not in
for some
, then
contains only boundary points
of
. So, if
has non-empty interior, then
is a subset of
for some
since the union of the
is
. The sum of the volumes of
the rectangles of
is the volume of
, which is at most equal to the
sum of the volumes of the
. So
is not of content 0 as it cannot
be covered with rectangles of total area less than the volume of
.
Suppose
where
are rectangles, say
. Let
where
and
. Then
contains all the
and hence also
. But then
is bounded, contrary to hypothesis.
The set of natural numbers is unbounded, and hence not of content 0 by part (a).
On the other hand, it is of measure zero. Indeed, if
, then
the union of the open intervals
for
. contains all the natural numbers and the total volume
of all the intervals is
.
Suppose a finite set of open rectangles
,
. cover of
and have total volume
less than
where
.
Let
where
. Then the union of the
cover the boundary of
and have total volume less than
.
So the boundary of
is also of content 0.
The set of rational numbers in the interval
is of measure 0 (cf Proof
of Problem 3-9 (b)), but
its boundary
is not of measure 0 (by Theorem 3-6 and Problem 3-8).
The set
closed and bounded, and hence compact. If it were also
of measure 0, then it would be of content 0 by Theorem 3-6. But then there
is a finite collection of open intervals which cover the set and have total
volume less than
. Since the set these open intervals together with the
set of
form an open cover of [0, 1], there is a finite subcover
of
. But then the sum of the lengths of the intervals in this
finite subcover would be less than 1, contrary to Theorem 3-5.
Using the hint, we know by Problem 1-30 that the set of
where
if finite for every
. Hence the set of discontinuities of
is
a countable union of finite sets, and hence has measure 0 by Theorem 3-4.
Since the set of rational numbers is countable, and cartesian products of
countable sets are countable, so is the set of all
-tuples of rational
numbers. Since the set of these intervals is just a subset of this set,
it must be countable too.
Following the hint, for each
in
, there is a rectangle B of the type
in part (a) such that
has non-zero volume, contains
and is contained
in some
in
. In fact, we can even assume that
is in the
interior of the rectangle
. In particular, the union of the interiors of
the rectangles
(where
is allowed to range throughout
) is a cover
of
. By part (a), the set of these
are countable, and hence so are
the set of corresponding
's; this set of corresponding
's cover
.