Following the hint,
is integrable with
by Problem 3-15 and Fubini's Theorem.
We have
. Now
is equivalent to
the condition that either
or
.
Both of these having integral 0 implies by Problem 3-18 that the sets where
their integrand is non-zero are of measure 0, and so
is also of measure 0.
The set
is the set of rational numbers in
which is of measure 0,
but not of content 0, because the integral of its characteristic function does
not exist. To see that the set
has content 0, let
. Let
be such that
. Then the set
can be covered by
the rectangles
and for each
in lowest terms
with
, the rectangle
where
. The sum of the areas of these rectangles
is less than
.
This follows from Problem 3-8 and Theorem 3-6, but that is not an induction.
Fubini's Theorem and induction on
show that
and so
does not have content 0, and hence is not of measure 0.
One has
and so by Fubini,
where
is an upper bound on the image of
.
where the upper bounds need to be determined.
By Fubini, the left hand iterated integral is just
where
Applying Fubini again,
shows that this integral is equal to
.
Following the hint, if
is not zero for some
point
, then we may assume (by replacing
with
if necessary that
it is positive at
. But then continuity implies that it is positive on
a rectangle
containing
. But then its integral over
is also positive.
On the other hand, using Fubini on
gives:
Similarly, one has
Subtracting gives:
which is a contradiction.
To avoid overlap, it is convenient to keep the set in the positive
half
plane. To do this, let
be the original Jordan measurable set in the
-plane, and replace it with
.
Theorem 3-9 can be used to show that
is Jordan measurable if
is.
The problem appears to be premature since we really want to be able to
do a change of variables to cylindrical coordinates. Assuming that we
know how to do that, the result becomes
.
but that
does not exist.
The problem has a typo in it; the author should not have switched the order
of the arguments of
as that trivializes the assertion.
The iterated integrals are zero because the inside integral is the zero function. The last integral cannot exist by Theorem 3-9 and Problem 1-17.
What is
, for
in the interior of
?
Let
be in the interior of
, fix
. We have
by Fubini's Theorem.
Using the hint, we have
.
One has
One has
and
where the second
assertion used Problem 3-32.
We have
and so by the chain rule one has
Show that
.
One has
If
is a rectangle, show that the volume of
is
.
In the three cases,
is
, 1, and 1 respectively. If the original
rectangle
, then
is
in the first case, is a cylinder with a parallelogram base in the second
case, and is the same rectangle except that the intervals in the
and
places are swapped in the third case. In the second case, the parallelogram
base is in the
and
directions and has corners
. So the volumes
do not change in the second and third case and get multiplied by
in the
first case. This shows the result.
If
is non-singular, then it is a composition of linear transformations
of the types in part (a) of the problem. Since
is multiplicative,
the result follows in this case.
If
is singular, then
is a proper subspace of
and
is a compact set in this proper subspace. In particular,
is contained in a hyperplane. By choosing the coordinate properly, the
hyperplane is the image of a linear transformation from
into
made up of a composition of maps of the first two types.
This shows that the compact portion of the hyperplane is of volume 0. Since
the determinant is also 0, this shows the result in this case too.
This is an immediate consequence of Fubini's Theorem since the inside integrals are equal.