For
a natural number, define
and
. Consider a partition of unity
subordinate to the
cover
. By summing the
with
the same
in condition (4) of Theorem 3-11, one can assume that there
is only one function for each
, let it be
. Now
exists if and only
converges.
But
. So the sum converges if and only if
exists.
Take a partition of unity
subordinate to the cover
where
for
.
As in part (a), we can assume there is only one
as in
condition (4) of Theorem 3-11. Consider the convergence of
. One has
where
. It follows that the sum in the middle does
not converge as
and so
does not
exist.
The assertion that
.
If not necessrily true. From the hypothesis, we only know the values
of the integral of
on the sets
, but don't know how
behaves
on other intervals -- so it could be that
may not even exist for all
To correct the situation, let
us assume that
is of constant sign and bounded on each set
.
Then
is bounded on each interval
and so
by Theorem 3-12, the integral in the extended sense is same as the that
in the old sense. Clearly, the integral in the old sense is monotone
on each interval of
, and the limit is
just
.
The sums
and
have terms of the same sign and are each divergent. So, by
re-ordering the terms of
, one can make the sum
approach any number we want; further this can be done so that there are
sequences of partial sums which converge monotonically to the limit value.
By forming open covers each set of which consists of intervals
for the sum of terms added to each of these partial sums, one gets covers
of
. Because
is zero outside
, one can
`fatten' up the covering sets so that they are a cover of the real numbers
no smaller than 1 without adding any points where
is non-zero. Finally,
one can take a partition of unity subordinate to this cover. By using
arrangements with different limiting values, one gets the result.