Let
Then
is open and
Theorem 3-13 applies with
in place of the
in its statement.
Let
be a partition of unity subordinate to an admissible cover
of
. Then
is a partion of unity subordinate to the cover
. Now
is absolutely convergent, and so
also converges since the terms are identical. So,
. By Theorem 3-14, we know that
. Combining results, we get Theorem
3-13.
We use the same idea as in the proof of Theorem 3-13. Let
be a point
where
. Let
, and
.
Then
. Define for
,
. Then
.
So we can define on successively smaller open neighborhoods of
, inverses
of
and
. One then can verify that
.
Combining results gives
and so
.
Now, if
is a diagonal matrix, then replace
with
.
for
and
. Then the
have the same form
as the
and
.
On the other hand, the converse is false. For example, consider the
function
. Since
is linear,
; so
is not a diagonal matrix.
Since
, to show that the function
is 1-1,
it suffices to show that
and
imply
. Suppose
.
Then
implies that
(or
). If
,
it follows that
. But then
and
has the same value, contrary to hypothesis. So,
is 1-1.
One has
So,
for all
in the domain of
.
Suppose
, i.e.
and
. If
,
then
implies
and so
. But then
contrary to hypothesis. On the other hand, if
, then let
and let
be the
angle between the positive
-axis and the ray from (0,0) through
.
Then
.
(Here
denotes the inverse of the function
.) Find P'(x,y). The function
is called the polar
coordinate system on
.
The formulas for
and
follow from the last paragraph
of the solution of part (a). One has
. This is trivial
from the formulas except in case
. Clearly,
.
Further,
L'H@ocirc;pital's Rule allows one to calculate
when
by
checking separately for the limit from the left and the limit from the right.
For example,
.
If
, show that
Assume that
and
.
Apply Theorem 3-13 to the map
by
. One has
and
. So the first identity holds. The second identity
is a special case of the first.
and
For the first assertion, apply part (c) with
.
Then
. Applying (c) gives
.
The second assertion follows from Fubini's Theorem.
and conclude that
One has
and the integrands are
everywhere positive. So
Since part (d) implies that
, the squeeze principle
implies that
also.
But using part (d) again, we get
also exists and is
(since the square root function is
continuous).