Let
be a collection of open sets, and
be their union.
If
, then there is an
with
. Since
is
open, there is an open rectangle
containing
.
So
is open.
Let
and
be open, and
. If
, then
there are open rectangles
(resp.
) containing
and contained in
(resp.
). Since the intersection of two open rectangles is an open
rectangle (Why?), we have
; so
is open.
The assertion about finitely many sets follows by induction.
The intersection of the open intervals
is the set containing only
, and so the intersection of even countably many open sets is not necessarily
open.
If
, then let
be the open rectangle centered at
with
sides of length
. If
, then
and so
. This proves that
is open.
The interior of
is the set
; the exterior is
;
and the boundary is the set
.
The interior of
is the empty set
; the exterior is
;
and the boundary is the set
.
The interior of
is the empty set
; the exterior is the empty set
;
and the boundary is the set
.
In each case, the proofs are straightforward and omitted.
To do the construction, first make a list
of all the rational numbers
in the interval [0, 1]. Then make a list
of all the quarters, sixteenths, etc.
of the unit sqare. For example,
could be made by listing all pairs
(a, b) of integers with
positive,
non-negative,
, in increasing order
of
, and amongst those with same value of
in increasing
lexicographical order; then simply eliminate those pairs for which there is
an earlier pair with the same value of
. Similarly, one could make
by listing first the quarters, then the sixteenths, etc. with an obvious
lexicographical order amongst the quarters, sixteenths, etc. Now, traverse
the list
: for each portion of the square, choose the point
such
that
is in the portion, both
and
are in the list
, neither
has yet been used, and such that the latter occurring (in
) of them is
earliest possible, and amongst such the other one is the earliest possible.
To show that this works, it suffices to show that every point
in the
square is in the boundary of
. To show this, choose any open rectangle
containing
. If it is
, let
. Let
be chosen so
that
. Then there is some
portion of the square
in
which is entirely contained within the rectangle and containing
.
Since this part of the square contains an element of the set A and elements
not in A (anything in the portion with the same x-coordinate
works), it
follows that
is in the boundary of
.
Clearly, the interior of
is
itself since it is a union of open sets;
also the exterior of
clearly contains
as
.
Since the boundary is the complement of the union of the interior and the
exterior, it suffices to show that nothing in
is in the exterior
of
. Suppose
is in the exterior of
. Let
be an open interval containing
and disjoint from
. Let
be a rational
number in
contained in
. Then there is a
which contains
, which is a contradiction.
Suppose
. Since
is open, there is an open
interval
containing
and disjoint from
. Now
contains a non-empty open subinterval of
and this is necessarily
disjoint from
. But every non-empty open subinterval of
contains
rational numbers, and
contains all rational numbers in
, which is
a contradiction.
Suppose
is compact. Let
be the open cover consisting of
rectangles
for all positive integers
. Since
is compact, there is a finite subcover
.
If
, then
and so
is bounded.
To show that
is closed, it suffices its complement is open.
Suppose
is not in
.
Then the collection
where
is an open cover of
. Let
be a finite subcover. Let
.
Then
is an open neighborhood of
which is disjoint from
. So the complement of
is open, i.e.
is closed.
Such an
is in the exterior of
, and so there is an open rectangle
containing
and disjoint from
.
Let
.
This was chosen so that
is
entirely contained within the open rectangle. Clearly, this means that
no
can be
, which shows the assertion.
For each
, choose
to be as in part (a). Then
is an open cover of
.
Let
be a finite subcover, and let
.
Then, by the triangle inequality, we know that
satisfies the assertion.
A counterexample:
is the x-axis and
is the graph of the
exponential function.
Let
be as in Problem 1-21 (b) applied with
and
.
Let
. It is
straightforward to verify that
is bounded and closed; so
is compact.
Finally,
is also true.