We can assume in the situation of Chapter 3 that
has the usual
orientation. The singular
-cubes with
can be taken
to be linear maps
where
and
are scalar constants.
One has with
, that
. So, the two integrals give the
same value.
For example, if we let
be the open interval
, one has
but
. One can also let
and
.
The compactness was used to guarantee that the sums in the proof were finite;
it also works under this assumption because all but finitely many
summands are zero if
vanishes outside of a compact subset of
.
One has
as
is
empty. With
the set of positive real numbers, one has with
that
.
Make the definition the same as done in the section, except don't require
the manifold be orientable, nor that the singular
-cubes be orientation
preserving. In order for this to work, we need to have the argument of
Theorem 5-4 work, and there the crucial step was to replace
with its absolute value so that Theorem 3-13 could be applied. In our case,
this is automatic because Theorem 4-9 gives
.
where
is an
-form on
, and
and
have the orientations induced by the usual orieentations of
and
.
Following the hint, let
. Then
is an
-dimensional manifold-with-boundary and its boundary is the union of
and
. Because the outward directed normals
at points of
are in opposite directions for
and
,
the orientation of
are opposite in the two cases. By Stokes'
Theorem, we have
. So the result is equivalent
to
. So, the result, as stated, is not correct; but,
for example, it would be true if
were closed.