For every
, there is an
with
. By Theorem 2-11,
there is an open set
and an open subset
such that
and
. Since clearly
, this shows that
is open. Furthermore
is differentiable.
It follows that
is differentiable at
. Since
was arbitrary,
it follows that
is differentiable.
By applying the previous results to the set
in place of
, we see that
is open.
We will show the result is true even if
is only defined in a non-empty open
subset of
.
Following the hint, we know that
is not constant in any open set. So,
suppose we have
(the case where
is analogous). Then there is an open neighborhood
of
with
for all
. The function
defined by
satisfies
for all
. Assuming that
and hence
are 1-1, we can apply Problem
2-36. The inverse function is clearly of the form
and so
for all
.
Now
is open but each horizontal line intersects
at most once
since
is 1-1. This is a contradiction since
is non-empty and open.
By replacing
with a vector of variables, the proof of part (a) generalizes
to the case where
is a function defined on an
open subset
of
where
.
For the general case of a map
where
is
an open subset of
with
, if
is constant in a non-empty
open set
, then we replace
with
and drop out
reducing the value of
by one. On the other hand, if
for some
, then consider the function
defined by
. Just as in part (a), this will be invertible on
an open subset of
and its inverse will look like
.
Replace
with
. Note that we have made
. Again, by restricting to an appropriate rectangle, we can
simply fix the value of
and get a 1-1 function defined on on a rectangle
in one less dimension and mapping into a space of dimension one less.
By repeating this process, one eventually gets to the case where
is
equal to 1, which we have already taken care of.
Suppose one has
for some
. By the mean value theorem,
there is a
between
and
such that
.
Since both factors on the right are non-zero, this is impossible.
Clearly,
for all
. The function is not 1-1 since
for all
.
to show that continuity of the derivative cannot be eliminated from the hypothesis of Theorem 2-11.
Clearly,
is differentiable for
. At
, one has
So
satisfies the conditions of Theorem 2-11 at
except that it
is not continuously differentiable at 0 since
for
.
Now
and it is straightforward
to verify that
for
all sufficiently large positive integers
. By the intermediate value
theorem, there is a
between
and
where
. By taking n larger and larger, we see that
is not 1-1 on any neighborhood of 0.