Define
by
for
.
One has
for all
. The
determinant condition guarantees that for each
, there is exactly
one solution of
, call that solution
.
Now, for each
, the Implicit function theorem says that there is
a function
defined in an open neighborhood
of
and such that
and
is differentiable. By the
uniqueness of the solutions in the last paragraph, it must be that
for all
in the domain of
. In
particular, the various functions
all glue together into a single
function defined on all of
and differentiable everywhere.
By differentiating the relation
, one gets
for
. Note that this is of the same form as the set of
equations for
except that the right hand side functions
have changed. An explicit formula can be obtained by using Cramer's
rule.
In this problem, it is assumed that
was meant to be continuously differentiable.
Just as in the last problem, the uniqueness condition guarantees that
is the same as the function provided by the implicit function
theorem applied to
. In particular,
is
differentiable and differentiating this last relation gives
. Solving for
gives the result.
This follows immediately from part (a).
Note that
is defined only when
and
are positive. So we need
to go back and show that the earlier parts of the problem generalize to this
case; there are no difficulties in doing this.
One has
precisely when
and so the hypothesis of part (a) is true and
. Also,
(since both
and
are positive), and so
for fixed
, the minimum of
occurs at
by the second
derivative test. Now actually, we are not looking for the minimum over all
, but just for those in the interval
. The derivative
for
. Further
precisely when
and there is a unique
where
.
For fixed
,
is achieved at
if
, at
if
, and
at
if
.
We will find where the maximum of the minimum's are located in each of the three cases.
Suppose
. Then we need to maximize
. The derivative of this function is negative
throughout the interval; so the maximum occurs at
. The maximum
value is
.
Suppose
. Then
. The derivative
of this function is
. This function has
no zeros in the interval because
has derivative
which is always negative in the interval and the value of the function is
positive at the right end point. Now
on the interval, and so
the maximum must occur at the left hand end point. The maximum value is
. In view of the last paragraph, that means that the maximum
over the entire interval
occurs at
.
Suppose
. Then
. This is a decreasing
function and so the maximum occurs at the left hand endpoint. By the
result of the previous paragraph the maximum over the entire interval
must therefore occur at
,
, and the value of the maximum
is
.