We will accept the Rules of Reasoning that we have been discussing as our logic rules in our mathematical system. There are several ways in which we can go about setting forth our axioms and undefined terms for geometry. We can keep the number of axioms down to a very few, in which case we need a large number of undefined terms, relations, and operations. We can keep the number of undefined terms, relations, and operations to a small number, thus requiring a larger number of axioms. We will actually work with the Axiom system set up by David Hilbert in 1899 in his book Foundations of Geometry. He not only clarified Euclid's definitions but also filled in the gaps in some of Euclid's proofs. Hilbert recognized that Euclid's proof for the side-angle-side criterion of congruence in triangles was based on an unstated assumption (the principle of superposition) and that this criterion had to be treated as an axiom. He built on the earlier work of Moritz Pasch, who in 1882 published the first rigorous treatise on geometry; Pasch made explicit Euclid's unstated assumptions about betweenness. At the same time we could have used the axioms set forth by Garret Birkhoff. These axioms are the ones with which you are more familiar, being the basis for the texts in High School Geometry. I have included both sets of axioms, so that you can compare the two. We will work exclusively with the Hilbert axioms. An interesting exercise is to prove everything that we will prove using Birkhoff's axioms. Some proofs are easier, and some are harder.
First, let us set our undefined terms. They will be
These objects are to be taken as undefined terms. We will not attempt to make a definition of any of them. However, when we wish to look at a specific example of our geometry, called a model, we will have to establish how each of these undefined terms is to be interpreted. For example, if we wish to look at the model where points are ordered pairs coming from the usual Cartesian plane and lines are the usual straight lines in the Cartesian plane, then we would be able to easily state what it means for a point to be incident with a particular line, what it means for one point to lie between two other points and what it means for two line segments to be congruent. We could change our example though to be a set of seven points, where lines would be ordered pairs of points, incidence would be set inclusion and betweenness and congruence would be meaningless. The particular model that we choose will determine our interpretation of the terms, but will not define them.
At this point we need to make some definitions. In order to do this we need our axiom system. I shall include all of the axioms here, though we will discuss them in more detail later.
Hilbert's Axioms for Neutral Geometry
Birkhoff's Axioms for Neutral Geometry
Definition: The plane is the collection of all points and lines.
Definition: The segment
A and B are the endpoints of the
segment AB.
Definition: Given points O and A in the plane. The set of points P such
that is a circle with center O. Each segment OP
is called a radius .
Definition: The ray
emanates from A and is
part of
.
Definition: The rays and
are opposite if they are
distinct, emanate from A, and are part of the same line
.
Definition: An angle with vertex A is
a point A together with
2 non-opposite rays and
, called the sides ,
emanating from A. Denote this angle by
.
Definition: If and
have a common side
and the other two sides
and
form opposite rays, the
angles are supplements or supplementary angles .
Definition: An angle is a right angle
if it has a supplementary angle to which it is congruent.
Definition: Two lines and m are parallel
if they do not intersect; i.e., if no point lies on both of them. Denote this by
.
Definition: Two lines and m are perpendicular
,
,
if they have a point A in common and there exist rays
, a part of
, and
, a part of m, such that
is a right
angle.